data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fde30/fde302fd9c7de183094cd27d633cc9a8c960ecf1" alt=""
"This is not for my family, which is there to offer me love and affection; it is to support the costs being incurred from the time I get up till late night when I have to wake up every three hours to prevent bed sores from worsening," he said. "I need two attendants and a driver. There are also the daily costs on physiotherapy and occupational therapy." Dhanaka's parents said they were "unhappy and shocked" over the "inadequate" compensation.
"We had claimed Rs7.5 crore after carefully calculating the expenses we had incurred over 18 years. But I am shocked as we never expected the court's verdict to direct just an amount of Rs1 crore as compensation. We have already spent more than that," said his mother Indira Seshadri. Dhanaka was a 20-year-old student in 1990 when he was admitted to the NIMS, a government-aided hospital, for treatment of a tumour in the chest cavity. He left the hospital seven months later in a wheelchair, permanently disabled.
In 1993, he moved the National Consumer Redressal Commission seeking compensation of Rs4.56 crore. The commission held the institute, its director, as well as the professors of cardio-thoracic surgery, neurosurgery, and general medicine guilty on various counts. The commission held that though it was not an emergency, the doctors failed to conduct the necessary pre-operative tests that would have indicated the need to involve a neurosurgeon.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1ff7/a1ff773da00c893f79678b22c32f21b5cc75982d" alt=""
The Supreme Court bench recorded its "deep appreciation" of Dhanaka for arguing his own case. "He remained unruffled and behaved with dignity and equanimity and pleaded his case bereft of any rancour or invective against those who, in his perception, harmed him," the justices observed.
No comments:
Post a Comment